Skip to content Opens in a new tab

ResultsCase 01 · Working‑capital result

Work was being won, then stalling between delivery, invoicing and collection.

Revenue was not the problem. Work that had already been delivered was slow to become an invoice, and invoices were slow to become collections.

Testing and certification groupTechnical facility · Multi-unit · EU

Headline outcome

−75%

Overdue receivables, year on year

Overdue receivables · year on yearCase 01
Project backlog
~150 → ~60 open
Invoicing time
cut to about a third

Situation

A multi-unit testing and certification group with steady demand and a full order book. Revenue was not the problem. Work that had already been delivered was slow to become an invoice, and invoices were slow to become collections.

Constraint

Undefined stage gates between delivery close, invoice creation and receivables follow-up. No service-level discipline at any of the three handoffs, and no single view of where each project sat in the chain.

What we did

  • Mapped the delivery-to-collection handoffs and named an owner for each stage.
  • Installed an invoicing rhythm with stage gates and service levels.
  • Separated the project backlog from receivables, so each could be worked as its own queue.
  • Set a recurring review, so the chain is inspected on a cadence, not on escalation.

The wider engagement

Brand refresh rolloutTwo websites and a landing pageMarketing strategy and planCustom internal softwareBusiness plan and financial modelHR assessment framework

Outcome

Overdue receivables down 75% year on year. The project backlog reduced from about 150 to about 60 open projects, and invoicing time was cut to about a third.

Anonymised by sector · Client names withheld · These results reflect combined work